UNDERPINNER FREE HOME ASSESSMENT WAS WRONG
๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐น๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐. ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐น๐, ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ต๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฅ๐ฃ๐๐ค ๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ
Report Highlights:
๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐ง๐๐ข๐ก
The house features:
โข Multi-level construction
โข Masonry, stud, and blueboard walls
โข Slab on ground, suspended slab, and timber floors
โข Tile roof
๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ก๐๐ฆ
Exterior:
โข Erosion voids under the firewall footing at the left garage entry
โข Slight erosion under the firewall of units 7 & 8
โข A non-vertical front storm water downpipe (original installation)
โข Edge gaps at some blueboard sheet joints and crack repairs on the front wall
โข Cracks in the old front driveway
โข Crack repairs on the north wall
โข A split joint seal on the west outdoor living roof beam
Interior:
โข Garage slab cracks
โข Cracks in the garage and store walls; fine cracks in the ceiling (slab)
โข Edge gaps in the added family/dining stud wall
โข Edge cracks on the kitchen bulkhead
โข Gaps between some door architraves and walls
โข Wear on the 3rd level window reveal trim and ceiling sheet edge gaps
โข A wall crack in the 2nd level laundry
โข Wall cracks in the 2nd level hallway and bedroom 3
๐๐๐ข๐ข๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ฆ
We reset the relative zero for each floor. Household items may restrict some approximate test locations. Note that carpet wear affects readings, bathroom slabs slope toward the floor waste, and garage floor slabs typically slope toward the door. Unit 9 (adjacent) recorded a level of -11 at the front left entry.
We measured floor levels (highlighted in red in mm). Some variations reflect “as finished” levels, while others likely stem from slight ground movements. We interpret these ground-movement variations as minimal and well within the tolerances of AS 2870 Appendix C and Table 4.1.
๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ
Wall cracks meet category 2 and garage slab cracks meet category 1 according to AS2870-2011 Appendix C.
๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฆ
๐๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ถ๐น ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐
Our local experience indicates that contractors pre-consolidated the housing estate’s founding soils, which consist of clean landfill, before construction.
Although civil engineers would certify the founding material’s quality density as a suitable standard for high-level footing construction, applied loads can cause slight initial or normal footing settlements within design tolerances. Some landfill can also shrink and swell with variations in moisture content, though this is generally insignificant and remains within design tolerances.
In this case, slight initial footing/slab settlements likely caused the cracks and gaps. Current, slight footing and slab movements likely contribute as well.
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐, ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ & ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
We found no evidence that the slight erosion under the garage firewall edge caused settlements or footing/slab instability.
๐ข๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ & ๐ด๐ฎ๐ฝ๐
Building elementsโblueboard, concrete, plasterboard, and framingโexpand and contract differentially as temperature and humidity vary.
Poor quality finishing and fitments during construction can exacerbate this.
๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐
“Plastic shrinkage cracks” caused the cracks in the garage floor shortly after the pour. These cracks occur as concrete shrinks during curing; they generally grow as surface edges wear and become more visible as they collect dirt. They are not a structural defect.
๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ
Brief
We found no evidence of significant footing or slab movement. Specifically, the unit 10/unit 9 garage common firewall and slab show no signs of settlement from storm drain erosion.
* Seal storm drain connections to prevent seepage under footing or slab edges.
* Plug the void with non-shrink cementitious grout.
* Repair exterior blueboard sheet edge gaps by raking them out and sealing them with Sikaflex 11FC or a similar product.
* Seal exterior door and window frame gaps with Sikaflex 11C or similar.
* Fill and paint interior ceiling and wall cracks using fibreglass joint tape.
* Leave garage floor cracks as they are; they do not require repair.
* Rake out and repair masonry and concrete cracks with high-bond strength non-shrink cementitious grout.
๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ก๐
If your house develops cracks and gaps, do yourself a favor: before investing in expensive underpinning, hire an independent engineer to determine if you actually need it and which type works best for your home.
๐๐ข๐ช ๐ ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฆ ๐๐ก ๐๐ก๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ง?
An expert RPEQ Engineer subsidence Report from Forensic Engineers generally costs between $700 – $900 ex GST (local service area only).
IS YOUR UNDERPINNER ARRANGING THE REPORT?
Some underpinners offer to arrange a report through their own engineer. They often charge considerably moreโup to $1,000 more than Forensic Engineers. This creates a huge conflict of interest. Forensic Engineers provide 100% independent reports. We do not work for or take payment from underpinners, and we never sell underpinning services.
๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ง๐ข ๐จ๐ฆ
For peace of mind, contact Forensic Engineers for a chat and an independent opinion before you commit to any underpinning.

